首页> 外文OA文献 >Prescription of non-occupational post-exposure HIV prophylaxis by emergency physicians: An analysis on accuracy of prescription and compliance
【2h】

Prescription of non-occupational post-exposure HIV prophylaxis by emergency physicians: An analysis on accuracy of prescription and compliance

机译:急诊医师对非职业性接触后预防性HIV的处方:对处方准确性和依从性的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective nPEP (non-Occupational Post Exposure Prophylaxis) registry based on patients consulting at one academic Emergency department located in Brussels, Belgium.We review here 1,357 cases consulting from January 2011 to December 2013.The objective of the study is to determine whether emergency physicians prescribe nPEP according to national guideline with support from IDS (infectious disease specialists). As this intervention has a high cost we wanted to verify correct allocation of treatment to high risk patients. Moreover we wanted to determine whether compliance to nPEP when prescribed by an Emergency Physician was different from literature reports. Finally we wanted to describe the population consulting for nPEP at our center. Emergency physicians prescribed nPEP more frequently in high risk exposures (98.6%) compared to intermediate risk exposures (53.2%); adequately allocating resources froma public health perspective. Appropriateness of prescription when evaluated according to nPEP Belgian guidelines was 98.8%.Compliance with nPEP prescribed by Emergency physicians was 60%in our study. Compliance was the highest inMSM (Men who have Sex with Men) while sexual assault victims showed the lowest compliance. Altogether this study suggests that Emergency physicians can safely and adequately prescribe nPEP when supported by a comprehensive guideline. Recognizing intrinsic differences within heterogeneous populations consulting for nPEPmay improve compliance to this high-cost public health intervention.
机译:我们回顾性分析了前瞻性nPEP(非职业性暴露后预防)注册中心的数据,该数据基于比利时布鲁塞尔一个学术急诊科的患者咨询服务,我们回顾了2011年1月至2013年12月的1357例咨询服务。该研究的目的是确定急诊医师是否在IDS(传染病专家)的支持下根据国家指南规定了nPEP。由于该干预措施成本高昂,我们希望验证对高危患者的正确治疗分配。此外,我们想确定由急诊医师处方时对nPEP的依从性是否与文献报告不同。最后,我们想在我们的中心描述nPEP的人口咨询。急诊医师在高风险暴露(98.6%)中比在中风险暴露(53.2%)中更频繁地开具nPEP。从公共卫生角度充分分配资源。根据比利时nPEP指南评估处方的适当性为98.8%。本研究中急诊医师对nPEP的依从性为60%。在男男性接触者(男男性接触者)中,依从性最高,而性侵犯受害者的依从性最低。总而言之,这项研究表明,在综合指南的支持下,急诊医师可以安全,充分地开出nPEP处方。认识异质人群中的内在差异咨询nPEP可能会提高对这种高成本公共卫生干预措施的依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号